Difference between revisions of "Stokoe2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Elizabeth Stokoe; Alexa Hepburn; Charles Antaki; | |Author(s)=Elizabeth Stokoe; Alexa Hepburn; Charles Antaki; | ||
| − | |Title=Beware the | + | |Title=Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention |
|Tag(s)=complaints; Conversation Analysis; disabilities; discourse; neighbor disputes; people | |Tag(s)=complaints; Conversation Analysis; disabilities; discourse; neighbor disputes; people | ||
|Key=Stokoe2012 | |Key=Stokoe2012 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=486–496 | |Pages=486–496 | ||
| + | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x/abstract | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | ||
|Note=WOS:000308480200009 | |Note=WOS:000308480200009 | ||
|Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA. | |Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:53, 21 February 2016
| Stokoe2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stokoe2012 |
| Author(s) | Elizabeth Stokoe, Alexa Hepburn, Charles Antaki |
| Title | Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | complaints, Conversation Analysis, disabilities, discourse, neighbor disputes, people |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | sep |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 486–496 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA.
Notes
WOS:000308480200009
