Difference between revisions of "Stokoe2012"
(BibTeX auto import 2014-10-23 11:14:39) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Elizabeth Stokoe; Alexa Hepburn; Charles Antaki; | ||
| + | |Title=Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=complaints; Conversation Analysis; disabilities; discourse; neighbor disputes; people | ||
| + | |Key=Stokoe2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=British Journal of Social Psychology | |Journal=British Journal of Social Psychology | ||
|Volume=51 | |Volume=51 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=486–496 | |Pages=486–496 | ||
| + | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x/abstract | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | ||
|Note=WOS:000308480200009 | |Note=WOS:000308480200009 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and | + | |Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:44, 29 November 2019
| Stokoe2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stokoe2012 |
| Author(s) | Elizabeth Stokoe, Alexa Hepburn, Charles Antaki |
| Title | Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | complaints, Conversation Analysis, disabilities, discourse, neighbor disputes, people |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 486–496 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA.
Notes
WOS:000308480200009
