Turowetz2015
| Turowetz2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Turowetz2015 |
| Author(s) | Jason Turowetz |
| Title | The interactional production of a clinical fact in a case of autism |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical, Autism, Diagnosis, Storytelling |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Sociology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 57–78 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11133-014-9294-8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The authority to diagnose is a distinguishing prerogative of modern medicine. While a growing body of research addresses various aspects of diagnosis, few studies analyze just how it is achieved through talk-in-interaction. This paper examines how clinicians assembled a diagnosis of a child who was evaluated for autism. Drawing on audio and video recordings at a clinic for developmental disabilities, I use a combination of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to show how a critical fact about the child’s mental functioning was formulated, challenged, and transformed across three consecutive stages of his evaluation: (1) testing, (2) a case conference among clinicians, and (3) an informing interview where the diagnosis was delivered to the parents. I analyze how this fact emerged as an outcome of clinician-child interactions, and how clinicians used storytelling to render its diagnostic implications. In addition to examining how these stories are methodically produced, I argue that they frame the child’s behavior in ways that suggest a lack of competence while eliding the skills and competencies he may have been displaying.
Notes
