Tseliou2018
| Tseliou2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Tseliou2018 |
| Author(s) | Eleftheria Tseliou |
| Title | Conversation analysis, discourse analysis and psychotherapy research: overview and methodological potential |
| Editor(s) | Olga Smoliak, Tom Strong |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Discursive Psychology, DP, Therapy, Psychotherapy, Discourse Analysis, Methodology |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 163–186 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Therapy as Discourse: Practice and Research |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
My aim in this chapter is to discuss certain ways in which Conversation Analysis (CA) and Discourse Analysis (DA) can methodologically contribute to psychotherapy research, particularly concerning systemic/discursive therapies. The use of qualitative research methodologies remains limited in psychotherapy research. Furthermore, research of systemic/discursive therapies is in need of methodological advances to address the context-specific, interactional perspective about change, espoused by such models. Following a brief overview of the place of CA and DA in psychotherapy research, I discuss certain notions/methodological tools of CA and Discursive Psychology (DPsy), a trend of DA, which bear potential to address such need. I conclude with limitations and implications of the use of CA and DPsy for the future of psychotherapy research.
Notes
