Silverman2012
| Silverman2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Silverman2012 |
| Author(s) | David Silverman |
| Title | Beyond armed camps: A response to Stokoe |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, MCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 329–336 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445612440769 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this response, I examine the ambiguity about the status of Membership Categorization Device Analysis (MCDA) in the work of Harvey Sacks. The ‘five guiding principles’ of MCDA that Stokoe enunciates serve as a crucial guide to future research. In what follows, I give some further examples of data analysis which, I believe, supports both her strong and weaker claims.
Notes
