Hyder2025

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Hyder2025
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hyder2025
Author(s) Sanaa Hyder, Sarah Peters, Dawn Edge, Susan Speer
Title Adopting innovative approaches to advance understanding of ‘cultural competence’ in clinical practice and communication
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Cultural competence, Healthcare communication, Conversation analysis, Ethnic minorities, Diversity
Publisher
Year 2025
Language English
City
Month
Journal Patient Education and Counseling
Volume 138
Number September 2025
Pages 109179
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109179
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

As healthcare and communication researchers, we read and resonated with several recent articles published in Patient Education and Counseling that call for culturally tailored and ‘culturally competent’ care [1], [2], [3], [4]. Culturally competent care (CCC) can be defined as “the ability of systems to provide care to patients with diverse values, beliefs, and behaviors by tailoring delivery to meet patients’ social, cultural, and linguistic needs” [5, p. v]. It involves taking an individualised approach to a patient’s care, and considering their personal interpretation of their culture [6]. Amalia et al. [1, p.1] emphasise the need for cultural and contextual adaptations of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients, noting that culturally sensitive interventions can improve patient engagement and adherence, in turn leading to better outcomes. Additionally, Haryadi et al. [2] highlight the importance of accounting for diverse patient characteristics, the dynamics of oppression, and the integration of multicultural competence into healthcare practices in integrative counselling. Au et al. [3] and Schouten et al. [4] stress the urgent need for more training in intercultural communication skills and CCC among healthcare professionals (HCPs). While we agree with these calls for action, we note that ‘cultural competence’ is often mentioned as a vague and abstract concept, lacking actionable insights based in evidence. There are still empirical gaps in the evidence base for clinical practice and communication, on which we expand with reference to training and development in the United Kingdom (UK).

Notes