Garfinkel2022a
| Garfinkel2022a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Garfinkel2022a |
| Author(s) | Harold Garfinkel |
| Title | A Comparison of Decisions Made on Four “Pre-Theoretical” Problems by Talcott Parsons and Alfred Schütz |
| Editor(s) | Douglas W. Maynard, John Heritage |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Garfinkel |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | New York, NY |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 71–89 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780190854409.003.0002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | The Ethnomethodology Program: Legacies and Prospects |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter compares “pre-theoretical decisions” made by Talcott Parsons and Alfred Schütz on the following dimensions: (1) a theory of objects; (2) the logical status and uses of empirical ideal types; (3) the observer as part of the field of observation; and (4) the logical status and uses of the “subjective” categories. A key distinction, somewhat indebted to Kaufmann (1944), is between the neo-Kantian “correspondence” and phenomenological “congruence” theories of reality. This distinction informs the four “pre-theoretical” decisions and the issues to which they are heir. The emphasis in extant sociological theory mostly has been predicated on the neo-Kantian solutions that informed Parsons’s approach to the pre-theoretical decisions, whereas Schütz’s decisions provide, inter alia, for a fresh attack on the relevance of time in the definition and conceptualization of action structures. The chapter is a condensation of themes from Chapter 5 of Harold Garfinkel’s dissertation, “The Perception of the Other: A Study in Social Order,” Harvard University: Department of Social Relations (1952), and was prepared by Garfinkel for a seminar in 1960.
Notes
