Wetherell2015
| Wetherell2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wetherell2015 |
| Author(s) | Margaret Wetherell, Jonathan Potter |
| Title | Discourse and Social Psychology, postmodernism, and capitalist collusion: an argument for more complex historiographies of psychology |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | June |
| Journal | Theory & Psychology |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 388–395 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0959354314552009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Hayter and Hegarty argue that Discourse and Social Psychology (DSP) is a text sustaining late capitalism as surely as Taylorism sustained the Fordist capitalist epoch. In response, we first situate DSP in its intellectual context; second, highlight limitations in Hayter and Hegarty's use of Harvey's work on the history of capitalism; third, note the importance of analysing contexts and effects in genealogical research on psychology; fourth, show how the argument fails to clearly explicate different senses of reflexivity in DSP and; finally, consider the platform DSP built for the study of ideology and the implications for Hayter and Hegarty's own project. All of this highlights a need for psychologists to be more sophisticated in their historiography.
Notes
