Raymond2025a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:15, 3 April 2026 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2026-04-03 08:15:01)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Raymond2025a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Raymond2025a
Author(s) Chase Wesley Raymond, Saul Albert, Elliott M. Hoey, Sarah M. Adams, Natalie Grothues, Jacob Henry, Olivia H. Marrese, Megan Pielke, Emily Reynolds, Regina Gayou Tom
Title Language policy as interactional practice in everyday public space: The Corpus of Language Discrimination in Interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Conversation analysis, Discourse, Social interaction, Ideologies, Language policy, Open-access data, Language discrimination
Publisher
Year 2025
Language
City
Month
Journal Language
Volume 101
Number 1
Pages e1–e37
URL Link
DOI 10.1353/lan.2025.a954236
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article introduces the Corpus of Language Discrimination in Interaction (CLDI)—an open-access corpus of transcribed video data, capturing moments where individuals are policed in some way for the language they are speaking or otherwise endorsing while sharing public space (e.g. in stores, restaurants, parking lots, and parks). Despite having thus far largely evaded systematic inquiry, such interactions are illustrative of a particular genre of language policymaking and enforcement that takes place in everyday social life, which the CLDI aims to document and make available for ongoing empirical examination. After presenting the corpus itself, as an initial exploration into some of the practices and actions observable in these data, we describe the recurrent use of Speak English directives, accompanied by nation-state declarative accounts like This is America. Detailed analysis of such turns, and the responses they receive, throws into relief ways that language policies and ideologies can be instantiated, ratified, challenged, defended, and otherwise negotiated in and through the particulars of interactants' joint conduct. We conclude by describing some future avenues for research, teaching, and public engagement on the basis of the CLDI.*

Notes

Publisher: Linguistic Society of America