ErikssonBarajas2009

From emcawiki
Revision as of 02:23, 2 November 2025 by JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Katarina Eriksson Barajas; Karin Aronsson; |Title=Avid versus struggling readers: co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk |Tag(...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
ErikssonBarajas2009
BibType ARTICLE
Key ErikssonBarajas2009
Author(s) Katarina Eriksson Barajas, Karin Aronsson
Title Avid versus struggling readers: co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Discursive psychology
Publisher
Year 2009
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics
Volume 18
Number 3
Pages 281–299
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/0963947009105854
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In the present article, we argue for a combination of reader reception studies and discursive psychology that we would like to call discursive reception studies: that is, discursive-psychological analyses of reader reception data. Such approaches provide possibilities to analyse the role of social interaction in the co-construction of the reading of a given book (or talk on a film or other reader reception data). Drawing on detailed analyses of video-recorded teacher-led booktalk sessions in grades 4—7, pupils’ self presentations and other types of co-construed categorizations of readers are examined and discussed in relation to the pupils’ and teachers’ co-construction of two contrasting categories of reader positions: avid readers (bokslukare ; literally, book-devourers), on the one hand, and struggling readers, on the other. These categorizations in turn involve two different sets of continua in terms of the participants’ (pupils’) spontaneous positionings: one based on motivation (willing versus unwilling readers) and one based on reading speed (fast versus slow readers). Both sets of contrasting categories involve implicit local hierarchies, yet these two continua do not necessarily overlap. An important finding is that the position of a fast reader does not imply the position of a book-lover. Through detailed examinations of the participants’ co-construed local hierarchies in booktalk, this study documents ways in which discursive reception studies may contribute to a deeper understanding of reading as a situated social practice. Our findings have implications for teacher training, with respect to the promotion of literary reading among children.

Notes