Wagner1998
Revision as of 01:21, 20 October 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Wagner1998 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wagner1998 |
| Author(s) | Johannes Wagner |
| Title | On doing being a guinea pig: a response to Seedhouse |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1998 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 103–113 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00021-6 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This reply to Seedhouse's response intends to further substantiate my methodological critique of data used in second language acquisition research. In a specific response to Seedhouse, I maintain that data from foreign language interaction pose new challenges to the study of talk-in-interaction.
Notes
See Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998) 85-102 for Seedhouse's critique.
