Atkinson1988
Revision as of 03:56, 31 May 2017 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Paul Atkinson |Title=Ethnomethodology: A Critical Review |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Conversation Analysis; |Key=Atkinson1988 |Ye...")
| Atkinson1988 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Atkinson1988 |
| Author(s) | Paul Atkinson |
| Title | Ethnomethodology: A Critical Review |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1988 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Annual Review of Sociology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 441-65 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The paper reviews recent publications in ethnomethodology (EM) from a sympathetic but critical perspective. It is agreed that EM has made major contributions to sociological theory and to the empirical investigation of everyday life. A number of major reservations are made, however. The author suggests that some contemporary versions of EM-onversation analysis in particular-have an unduly restricted perspective. They give rise to a sociolo gy which is behaviorist and empiricist, and which does not reflect the interpretative origins that inspired EM. Far from being a coherent and homogenous movement, the author suggests, EM is marked by inconsistency.
Notes
