Vine2008

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:02, 15 November 2017 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elaine W. Vine |Title=CA and SCT: strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions? |Tag(s)=EMCA; Classroo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Vine2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Vine2008
Author(s) Elaine W. Vine
Title CA and SCT: strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions?
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Classroom interactions
Publisher
Year 2008
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 10
Number 5
Pages 673-693
URL
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608094218
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

CA and SCT: strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions? Elaine W. Vine First Published October 1, 2008 Others Download PDFPDF download for CA and SCT: strange bedfellows or useful partners for understanding classroom interactions? Article information No Access Article Information Volume: 10 issue: 5, page(s): 673-693 Article first published online: October 1, 2008;Issue published: October 1, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608094218 Elaine W. Vine VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND, elaine.vine@vuw.ac.nz

Abstract

Understanding classroom interactions is a complex process. This article explores what conversation analysis (CA) and sociocultural theory of learning (SCT) can contribute to that process. The exploration is carried out through analyses of interactions between Brian, a five-year-old boy, and Ms Nikora, his teacher, during a nine-hour social studies curriculum unit in a New Zealand classroom. CA and SCT may appear to be strange bedfellows, in that the former concerns itself with language use (how participants organize and manage conversations), while the latter concerns itself with language as mediation (how learning occurs), but they turn out to be useful partners. The analyses reveal at least three perspectives from which participants need to be understanding what is going on in classroom interactions in order to participate in them appropriately and learn through them: how people organize conversations, institutional talk, and how teachers and learners jointly construct learning opportunities.

Notes