Bilmes1993
| Bilmes1993 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bilmes1993 |
| Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
| Title | Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Culture, Implicature, Pragmatics, Grice |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1993 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 387-409 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper is, in part, an attempt to "respecify" the study of implicature as an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic undertaking. To the linguistic pragmzrtists, I am proposing a methodological reorientation. To the ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts, I am proposing a broadening of interests ancl an open-minded appreciation of what linguistic pragmatics has to offer. To both, I am suggesting an increased sensitivity to the subtleties of cultural context.a There remains, of course, the question of whether Grice's particular proposals are useful or accurate. In what tollows, I will have occasion to offer some evaluation of the Gricean approach, but I will be primarily concerned with presenting a form of nonGricean implicature. The approach that I propose grounds implicature in specific conversational procedures and cultural understandings, and produces, I believe, clearer and more constrained outcomes than Gricean procedures.
Notes