Wu2026
| Wu2026 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Wu2026 |
| Author(s) | Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu, John Heritage, Chase Wesley Raymond |
| Title | Stance in interaction |
| Editor(s) | Matthew Burdelski, Tim Greer |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Stance |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Year | 2026 |
| Language | English |
| City | London |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 109–124 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781032720852-8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | The Routledge Handbook of Conversation Analysis |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Although there is a widespread acknowledgement that stance is a ubiquitous feature of social interaction and language use, it is only over the past decade or so that it has emerged as a blooming and dedicated topic of interest in the language and social sciences. This chapter provides a brief history of the linguistic and sociological lineages of the exploration on stance. It then offers an overview of current conversation analysis (CA) research on stance, focused primarily on its epistemic, deontic, and affective dimensions. The chapter ends with a discussion of the contributions this body of stance research has made to the fields of CA, linguistics, and language and social interaction in general, as well as its implications for future research.
Notes
