Difference between revisions of "Response Cries"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From [[Goffman1978]]: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog." | From [[Goffman1978]]: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog." | ||
| + | |||
| + | Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * http://ideophone.org/ideophones-are-not-response-cries/ | ||
| + | * http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03782166/18/2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword: | ||
{{#widget:Iframe | {{#widget:Iframe | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 17 August 2016
From Goffman1978: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."
Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:
- http://ideophone.org/ideophones-are-not-response-cries/
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03782166/18/2
However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword:
