Difference between revisions of "Coulter1983"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02127769 | |URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02127769 | ||
|DOI=10.1007/BF02127769 | |DOI=10.1007/BF02127769 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This discussion will attempt to exploit a distinction to be drawn between contingent and a priori structures of illocutionary actions in the service of formulating a response to the following problem: to what extent, if at all, do claims for the conventionality of any given, identified sequential arrangement | ||
| + | of utterances arising in natural conversational interaction depend upon | ||
| + | statistical arguments? | ||
| + | Given that there are indefinitely many conversations going on in the world, how | ||
| + | are serious analytical claims for the "naturalness" or "organizational priority" | ||
| + | of specific sequential arrangements to be justified? | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:42, 23 June 2016
| Coulter1983 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Coulter1983 |
| Author(s) | Jeff Coulter |
| Title | Contingent and a priori structures in sequential analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sequential Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1983 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 361–374 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF02127769 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This discussion will attempt to exploit a distinction to be drawn between contingent and a priori structures of illocutionary actions in the service of formulating a response to the following problem: to what extent, if at all, do claims for the conventionality of any given, identified sequential arrangement of utterances arising in natural conversational interaction depend upon statistical arguments? Given that there are indefinitely many conversations going on in the world, how are serious analytical claims for the "naturalness" or "organizational priority" of specific sequential arrangements to be justified?
Notes
