Difference between revisions of "Stommel-van-der-Houwen2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)= Wyke Stommel; Fleur van der Houwen |Title=Formulations in “trouble” chat sessions |Editor(s)= I. Kupferberg; I. Gilat |Tag(s)=...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | |Author(s)= Wyke Stommel; Fleur van der Houwen | + | |Author(s)=Wyke Stommel; Fleur van der Houwen |
|Title=Formulations in “trouble” chat sessions | |Title=Formulations in “trouble” chat sessions | ||
| − | |Editor(s)= I. Kupferberg; I. Gilat | + | |Editor(s)=I. Kupferberg; I. Gilat |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Formulations; Internet Relay Chat; Troubles; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Formulations; Internet Relay Chat; Troubles; |
|Key=Stommel-van-der-Houwen2013 | |Key=Stommel-van-der-Houwen2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
| − | |Booktitle= | + | |Booktitle=Language@Internet |
|Volume=10 | |Volume=10 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | | | + | |URL=http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2013/stommel |
| + | |Abstract=In this article, we examine the organizational and interactional tasks of formulations in chat counseling, as these have been found to play an important interactional role in face-to-face counseling. The data consist of 53 individual chat sessions of approximately 25 minutes each between a coach and a client with moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. Using conversation analysis (CA) as a method, the study finds three uses of formulation: 1) organizing formulations, 2) clarifying formulations, and 3) ‘therapeutic’ formulations. The first and third types are used in ways comparable to face-to-face therapy. The second type is a strategy to deal with trouble in the interaction and aims at re-establishing intersubjectivity. The analysis reveals the important role of question marks and reduced conditional relevance of a response to a formulation in chat. This study contributes to the understanding of institutional interaction online and the interconnection between medium structure and social interaction. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 03:42, 27 February 2016
| Stommel-van-der-Houwen2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stommel-van-der-Houwen2013 |
| Author(s) | Wyke Stommel, Fleur van der Houwen |
| Title | Formulations in “trouble” chat sessions |
| Editor(s) | I. Kupferberg, I. Gilat |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Formulations, Internet Relay Chat, Troubles |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Language@Internet |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article, we examine the organizational and interactional tasks of formulations in chat counseling, as these have been found to play an important interactional role in face-to-face counseling. The data consist of 53 individual chat sessions of approximately 25 minutes each between a coach and a client with moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. Using conversation analysis (CA) as a method, the study finds three uses of formulation: 1) organizing formulations, 2) clarifying formulations, and 3) ‘therapeutic’ formulations. The first and third types are used in ways comparable to face-to-face therapy. The second type is a strategy to deal with trouble in the interaction and aims at re-establishing intersubjectivity. The analysis reveals the important role of question marks and reduced conditional relevance of a response to a formulation in chat. This study contributes to the understanding of institutional interaction online and the interconnection between medium structure and social interaction.
Notes
