Difference between revisions of "Lerner1989"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-09-17 10:14:11) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; |
|Title=Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion | |Title=Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; delayed completion; overlap; turn-taking | |Tag(s)=EMCA; delayed completion; overlap; turn-taking | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Lerner1989 |
|Year=1989 | |Year=1989 | ||
|Journal=Western Journal of Speech Communication | |Journal=Western Journal of Speech Communication | ||
| − | |Number= | + | |Volume=53 |
| + | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=167–177 | |Pages=167–177 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10570318909374298 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/10570318909374298 | ||
|Abstract=A turn-taking system allocates speaking turns in conversation. Nonetheless, on occasion speakers start up out of turn. This report examines one procedure, Delayed Completion, that speakers use to finish a discontinued turn after an intervening utterance by another speaker. Speakers employ resources intrinsic to the turn-taking system, such as the projectability of turn unit completion, ta regain turn occupancy and to locate the utterance of the out-of-turn speaker as having been interruptive. When the intervening utterance makes a next action relevant, Delayed Completion can also cancel the relevance of that next action. | |Abstract=A turn-taking system allocates speaking turns in conversation. Nonetheless, on occasion speakers start up out of turn. This report examines one procedure, Delayed Completion, that speakers use to finish a discontinued turn after an intervening utterance by another speaker. Speakers employ resources intrinsic to the turn-taking system, such as the projectability of turn unit completion, ta regain turn occupancy and to locate the utterance of the out-of-turn speaker as having been interruptive. When the intervening utterance makes a next action relevant, Delayed Completion can also cancel the relevance of that next action. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 14 February 2016
| Lerner1989 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lerner1989 |
| Author(s) | Gene H. Lerner |
| Title | Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, delayed completion, overlap, turn-taking |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1989 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Western Journal of Speech Communication |
| Volume | 53 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 167–177 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/10570318909374298 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A turn-taking system allocates speaking turns in conversation. Nonetheless, on occasion speakers start up out of turn. This report examines one procedure, Delayed Completion, that speakers use to finish a discontinued turn after an intervening utterance by another speaker. Speakers employ resources intrinsic to the turn-taking system, such as the projectability of turn unit completion, ta regain turn occupancy and to locate the utterance of the out-of-turn speaker as having been interruptive. When the intervening utterance makes a next action relevant, Delayed Completion can also cancel the relevance of that next action.
Notes