Difference between revisions of "Rawls1984"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; |Title=Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique: a comparison of Goffman and Sartre |Tag(s)=EMCA; Et...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; | + | |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; |
|Title=Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique: a comparison of Goffman and Sartre | |Title=Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique: a comparison of Goffman and Sartre | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Gofman; Epistemology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Gofman; Epistemology | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Sociological Theory | |Journal=Sociological Theory | ||
|Volume=2 | |Volume=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=222–252 |
| + | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/223349 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.2307/223349 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre is critiqued from the point of view of Goffmanian sociology of everyday life. Despite many parallels between the two positions, the philosophical viewpoint should not be taken as necessarily more sophisticated than the sociological. Meaning, self, and institutional order are interactional achievements, and thus studies in conversational analysis and ethnomethodology become the basis for a critique of epistemology. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 13 February 2016
| Rawls1984 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rawls1984 |
| Author(s) | Anne Warfield Rawls |
| Title | Interaction as a resource for epistemological critique: a comparison of Goffman and Sartre |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Gofman, Epistemology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1984 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 222–252 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2307/223349 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre is critiqued from the point of view of Goffmanian sociology of everyday life. Despite many parallels between the two positions, the philosophical viewpoint should not be taken as necessarily more sophisticated than the sociological. Meaning, self, and institutional order are interactional achievements, and thus studies in conversational analysis and ethnomethodology become the basis for a critique of epistemology.
Notes
