Difference between revisions of "Bilmes1996"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Reseaux | |Journal=Reseaux | ||
|Volume=80 | |Volume=80 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=129–142 |
| + | |URL=http://www.persee.fr/doc/reso_0751-7971_1996_num_14_80_3806 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.3406/reso.1996.3806 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Although silence can be taken to mean a total absence of sound, the word is frequently used with reference to a socio-cultural environment. This article focuses on silence as the absence of talk. The richness and multiplicity of silences stems from the fact that a particular silence may consist of an absence in relation to a particular subject of conversation. Thus, for each type of talk, there exists a type of silence. Silences are made particularly meaningful through what we here call « weakly constituent machanisms » or, in other words, what by convention constitutes a relevant silence. Conversation analysis enables us to highlight some aspects of the role and significance of silence in conversation. Finally, we introduce the concept of « implicit silence ». Implicit silence originates with a flow of talk in which something is considered important but is left unsaid. We show how certain types of sociological analysis pinpoint implicit silences. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 13 February 2016
| Bilmes1996 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bilmes1996 |
| Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
| Title | Le silence reconstitué: La vie dans un monde de plénitude de sens |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Silence |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1996 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Reseaux |
| Volume | 80 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 129–142 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.3406/reso.1996.3806 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Although silence can be taken to mean a total absence of sound, the word is frequently used with reference to a socio-cultural environment. This article focuses on silence as the absence of talk. The richness and multiplicity of silences stems from the fact that a particular silence may consist of an absence in relation to a particular subject of conversation. Thus, for each type of talk, there exists a type of silence. Silences are made particularly meaningful through what we here call « weakly constituent machanisms » or, in other words, what by convention constitutes a relevant silence. Conversation analysis enables us to highlight some aspects of the role and significance of silence in conversation. Finally, we introduce the concept of « implicit silence ». Implicit silence originates with a flow of talk in which something is considered important but is left unsaid. We show how certain types of sociological analysis pinpoint implicit silences.
Notes
