Difference between revisions of "Emmertsen2010"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sofie Emmertsen; Trine Heinemann; |Title=Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Con...") |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Sofie Emmertsen; Trine Heinemann; | + | |Author(s)=Sofie Emmertsen; Trine Heinemann; |
|Title=Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction | |Title=Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Danish; Affiliation; Epistemics; Response Tokens | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Danish; Affiliation; Epistemics; Response Tokens; Non-response; |
|Key=Emmertsen2010 | |Key=Emmertsen2010 | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 4 January 2016
| Emmertsen2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Emmertsen2010 |
| Author(s) | Sofie Emmertsen, Trine Heinemann |
| Title | Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Danish, Affiliation, Epistemics, Response Tokens, Non-response |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 109-132 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351811003738059 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article investigates the use of the Danish response token nåja in naturally occurring conversation. The article shows that nåja functions as a change-of-state token with which a speaker claims to have just now realized matters relevant for the prior talk. Whether caused by the speaker's recollection, recognition, or understanding of relevant matters, the realization token functions as a claim that (a) there were problems in the speaker's prior turns due to her lack of understanding, and (b) that these problems are now solved due to a change in the speaker's epistemic access. The realization token can therefore be used to remedy prior turns that are potentially or actually disaffiliative in a way that minimally involves questions of character or relationship.
Notes
