Difference between revisions of "Bogen1996"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David Bogen; |Title=The allure of a "truly general theory of knowledge and science": A comment on Pels' |Key=Bogen1996 |Year=1996 |Jour...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=David Bogen; | + | |Author(s)=David Bogen; |
|Title=The allure of a "truly general theory of knowledge and science": A comment on Pels' | |Title=The allure of a "truly general theory of knowledge and science": A comment on Pels' | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sociology of knowledge; Knowledge; | ||
|Key=Bogen1996 | |Key=Bogen1996 | ||
|Year=1996 | |Year=1996 | ||
|Journal=Sociological Theory | |Journal=Sociological Theory | ||
| + | |Volume=14 | ||
| + | |Pages=187-192 | ||
| + | |URL=http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=3276483 | ||
| + | |Abstract=THERE. critically examines an article by D. Pels entitled "Karl Mannheim and the sociology of scientific knowledge: Towards a new agenda". It shows that for the latter the sociology of knowledge is in a deadlock. He warns against the growing influence of Wittgenstein he describes relativistic. Pels believes that an approach inspired by that of Mannheim will provide a general theoretical framework to better understand the nature of knowledge. THERE. this understanding are the theory developed by Wittgenstein. It shows that Pels misinterpreted the thought of it | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:08, 25 March 2015
| Bogen1996 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bogen1996 |
| Author(s) | David Bogen |
| Title | The allure of a "truly general theory of knowledge and science": A comment on Pels' |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sociology of knowledge, Knowledge |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1996 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 187-192 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
THERE. critically examines an article by D. Pels entitled "Karl Mannheim and the sociology of scientific knowledge: Towards a new agenda". It shows that for the latter the sociology of knowledge is in a deadlock. He warns against the growing influence of Wittgenstein he describes relativistic. Pels believes that an approach inspired by that of Mannheim will provide a general theoretical framework to better understand the nature of knowledge. THERE. this understanding are the theory developed by Wittgenstein. It shows that Pels misinterpreted the thought of it
Notes
