Difference between revisions of "Kuroshima2025a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INBOOK |Author(s)=Satomi Kuroshima; |Title=Reading medical records aloud: Enhancing the validity of informing laboratory results |Editor(s)=Keiko Tsuchiya;...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Satomi Kuroshima; | |Author(s)=Satomi Kuroshima; | ||
|Title=Reading medical records aloud: Enhancing the validity of informing laboratory results | |Title=Reading medical records aloud: Enhancing the validity of informing laboratory results | ||
Revision as of 06:41, 11 November 2025
| Kuroshima2025a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Kuroshima2025a |
| Author(s) | Satomi Kuroshima |
| Title | Reading medical records aloud: Enhancing the validity of informing laboratory results |
| Editor(s) | Keiko Tsuchiya |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, medical records, Read-aloud, diabetes, health management |
| Publisher | Springer Singapore |
| Year | 2025 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | may |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 115–139 |
| URL | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9338-9_6 |
| ISBN | 978-981-97-9338-9 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Exploring health and well-being in Japanese context |
| Chapter | 6 |
Abstract
Tools are crucial resources for participation in social interactions, and electronic and paper-based medical records can be considered as such in doctor–patient interactions. Although doctors and patients sometimes display their orientation toward records to achieve specific interactional goals, few studies have explored how medical records can be used to construct a specific social action relevant to an ongoing consultation. The present study employed conversation analysis examining how doctors use medical records to construct various social actions during routine diabetes check-ups at an internal medicine department in the Tohoku area of Japan. Specifically, it elucidates how reading aloud laboratory results in the medical record enables doctors to secure patients’ understanding and acceptance of medical recommendations by orienting the patients toward the validity of the informed result, which would provide a ground for further assessment of the results and daily health management recommendations. In other words, using medical records in a particular way involves how participants manage their commitment to their role and who is responsible for a patient’s daily health management. This study not only contributes to the body of knowledge concerning action formation in interaction but also the sociology of medicine by explicating how the use of medical records in practice originates as an accountable phenomenon based on participants’ practical reasoning.
Notes
