Difference between revisions of "Nishizaka2025a"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Aug Nishizaka; Kaoru Hayano; |Title=Targeting and double accountabilities of action in interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; Targeting; Di...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Aug Nishizaka; Kaoru Hayano; | |Author(s)=Aug Nishizaka; Kaoru Hayano; | ||
|Title=Targeting and double accountabilities of action in interaction | |Title=Targeting and double accountabilities of action in interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Targeting; Differential relationships to a referent; Double accountabilities of action; Turn allocation; Conversation analysis |
|Key=Nishizaka2025a | |Key=Nishizaka2025a | ||
|Year=2025 | |Year=2025 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Text & Talk | |Journal=Text & Talk | ||
| + | |Volume=45 | ||
| + | |Number=5 | ||
| + | |Pages=657-680 | ||
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2023-0218/html | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2023-0218/html | ||
|DOI=10.1515/text-2023-0218 | |DOI=10.1515/text-2023-0218 | ||
|Abstract=This study documents the mechanism by which a speaker accomplishes targeting the current turn at an unselected recipient; it does so by reference to what we will call participants’ differential relationships to a referent. Several video recordings of Japanese ordinary conversations are examined with the methodology of conversation analysis. The findings show that the differential relationships are resources for generating double accountabilities of action; the targeted turn implements one action for the selected recipient and another for the target recipient. The use of differential relationships also provides publicly witnessable grounds for the distribution of turn-allocation techniques. We argue that targeting is a rich domain in which turn allocation and the accountability of action intersect. | |Abstract=This study documents the mechanism by which a speaker accomplishes targeting the current turn at an unselected recipient; it does so by reference to what we will call participants’ differential relationships to a referent. Several video recordings of Japanese ordinary conversations are examined with the methodology of conversation analysis. The findings show that the differential relationships are resources for generating double accountabilities of action; the targeted turn implements one action for the selected recipient and another for the target recipient. The use of differential relationships also provides publicly witnessable grounds for the distribution of turn-allocation techniques. We argue that targeting is a rich domain in which turn allocation and the accountability of action intersect. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:03, 27 August 2025
| Nishizaka2025a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Nishizaka2025a |
| Author(s) | Aug Nishizaka, Kaoru Hayano |
| Title | Targeting and double accountabilities of action in interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Targeting, Differential relationships to a referent, Double accountabilities of action, Turn allocation, Conversation analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2025 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Text & Talk |
| Volume | 45 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 657-680 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/text-2023-0218 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study documents the mechanism by which a speaker accomplishes targeting the current turn at an unselected recipient; it does so by reference to what we will call participants’ differential relationships to a referent. Several video recordings of Japanese ordinary conversations are examined with the methodology of conversation analysis. The findings show that the differential relationships are resources for generating double accountabilities of action; the targeted turn implements one action for the selected recipient and another for the target recipient. The use of differential relationships also provides publicly witnessable grounds for the distribution of turn-allocation techniques. We argue that targeting is a rich domain in which turn allocation and the accountability of action intersect.
Notes
