Difference between revisions of "Eilitta2021"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-06-28 09:44:43) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Tiina Eilittä; Pentti Haddington; Anna Vatanen; | ||
| + | |Title=Children Seeking the Driver's Attention in Cars: Position and Composition of Children's Summons Turns and Children's Rights to Engage | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Adult-child interaction; Agency; Conversational rights; In-car interaction; Summons; Turn-taking | ||
|Key=Eilitta2021 | |Key=Eilitta2021 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=178 | |Volume=178 | ||
|Pages=175–191 | |Pages=175–191 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216621001028 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.005 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.005 | ||
|Abstract=This paper explores the topic of children having restricted rights to engage in conversation with adults in multiparty interactions. Drawing on the principles of conversation analysis, and 7 h of video-recorded Finnish and English naturally occurring in-car family interactions, our focus is on moments when a child summons the driver while the driver is driving and having a conversation with another passenger. We suggest that the composition and position of the child's summons relative to other ongoing conversations play a crucial role in whether the child receives a response, or whether the summons will be ignored or suspended by the driver. Positioning and designing summonses in different ways is a resource for the child to exert agency and mobilize a response from the driver to different degrees, which affects the child's likelihood of entering in interaction with the driver at that moment. The analysis suggests that children cannot be a priori determined to have (or not to have) certain kinds of speaking rights; instead, the ``right'' to engage in a conversation is contingent and situated, (re)negotiated and accomplished in situ. Finally, summons-answer sequences provide adults a resource for socializing children into the regularities of turn allocation and turn distribution. | |Abstract=This paper explores the topic of children having restricted rights to engage in conversation with adults in multiparty interactions. Drawing on the principles of conversation analysis, and 7 h of video-recorded Finnish and English naturally occurring in-car family interactions, our focus is on moments when a child summons the driver while the driver is driving and having a conversation with another passenger. We suggest that the composition and position of the child's summons relative to other ongoing conversations play a crucial role in whether the child receives a response, or whether the summons will be ignored or suspended by the driver. Positioning and designing summonses in different ways is a resource for the child to exert agency and mobilize a response from the driver to different degrees, which affects the child's likelihood of entering in interaction with the driver at that moment. The analysis suggests that children cannot be a priori determined to have (or not to have) certain kinds of speaking rights; instead, the ``right'' to engage in a conversation is contingent and situated, (re)negotiated and accomplished in situ. Finally, summons-answer sequences provide adults a resource for socializing children into the regularities of turn allocation and turn distribution. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:10, 7 July 2021
| Eilitta2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Eilitta2021 |
| Author(s) | Tiina Eilittä, Pentti Haddington, Anna Vatanen |
| Title | Children Seeking the Driver's Attention in Cars: Position and Composition of Children's Summons Turns and Children's Rights to Engage |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Adult-child interaction, Agency, Conversational rights, In-car interaction, Summons, Turn-taking |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 178 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 175–191 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.005 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper explores the topic of children having restricted rights to engage in conversation with adults in multiparty interactions. Drawing on the principles of conversation analysis, and 7 h of video-recorded Finnish and English naturally occurring in-car family interactions, our focus is on moments when a child summons the driver while the driver is driving and having a conversation with another passenger. We suggest that the composition and position of the child's summons relative to other ongoing conversations play a crucial role in whether the child receives a response, or whether the summons will be ignored or suspended by the driver. Positioning and designing summonses in different ways is a resource for the child to exert agency and mobilize a response from the driver to different degrees, which affects the child's likelihood of entering in interaction with the driver at that moment. The analysis suggests that children cannot be a priori determined to have (or not to have) certain kinds of speaking rights; instead, the ``right to engage in a conversation is contingent and situated, (re)negotiated and accomplished in situ. Finally, summons-answer sequences provide adults a resource for socializing children into the regularities of turn allocation and turn distribution.
Notes
