Difference between revisions of "Walker2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gareth Walker |Title=Close proximity of turn-continuation to possible turn-completion in conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation; Phonet...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Speech Communication | |Journal=Speech Communication | ||
|Volume=99 | |Volume=99 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=231–241 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016763931630173X |
| − | |Abstract=Speakers in conversation are in the | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.specom.2018.02.006 |
| − | This article extends our understanding of how speakers do this, and to what interactional | + | |Abstract=Speakers in conversation are in the first instance allocated the space in which to produce a single unit of talk which could figure as a complete turn. One way speakers can continue talk beyond a point of possible turn-completion is by producing a continuation in maximally close proximity to the point of possible turn-completion. This article extends our understanding of how speakers do this, and to what interactional effect. Several phonetic features characterising close-proximity continuations are described. These include continuation of voicing, articulatory anticipation and other phonetic features. It is argued that close-proximity continuation helps ensure speakers get to continue their turn past a point of possible turn-completion. This argument is supported by close inspection of the talk leading up to the point of possible turn-completion, the start of the continuation, and the responses of co-participants – especially with regard to whether the point of possible turn-completion engenders incoming talk or not. The method combines analysis of phonetic and sequential details of 240 points of possible turn-completion in audio recordings of unscripted American English telephone calls. |
| − | speakers get to continue their turn past a point of possible turn-completion. This argument is supported by close inspection of the talk leading up to the point of possible turn-completion, the start of the continuation, and the responses of co-participants – especially with regard to whether the point of possible turn-completion engenders | ||
| − | incoming talk or not. The method combines analysis of phonetic and sequential details of 240 points of possible turn-completion in audio recordings of unscripted American English telephone calls. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:48, 11 January 2020
| Walker2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Walker2018 |
| Author(s) | Gareth Walker |
| Title | Close proximity of turn-continuation to possible turn-completion in conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation, Phonetics, Pragmatics, Prosody, Turn-continuation, Turn-taking |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Speech Communication |
| Volume | 99 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 231–241 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.specom.2018.02.006 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Speakers in conversation are in the first instance allocated the space in which to produce a single unit of talk which could figure as a complete turn. One way speakers can continue talk beyond a point of possible turn-completion is by producing a continuation in maximally close proximity to the point of possible turn-completion. This article extends our understanding of how speakers do this, and to what interactional effect. Several phonetic features characterising close-proximity continuations are described. These include continuation of voicing, articulatory anticipation and other phonetic features. It is argued that close-proximity continuation helps ensure speakers get to continue their turn past a point of possible turn-completion. This argument is supported by close inspection of the talk leading up to the point of possible turn-completion, the start of the continuation, and the responses of co-participants – especially with regard to whether the point of possible turn-completion engenders incoming talk or not. The method combines analysis of phonetic and sequential details of 240 points of possible turn-completion in audio recordings of unscripted American English telephone calls.
Notes
