Difference between revisions of "Kashimura2015"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Shiro Kashimura | |Author(s)=Shiro Kashimura | ||
| − | |Title=Hearing | + | |Title=Hearing clients' talk as lawyers' work: the case of public legal consultation conference |
|Editor(s)=Baudouin Dupret; Michael Lynch; Tim Berard; | |Editor(s)=Baudouin Dupret; Michael Lynch; Tim Berard; | ||
|Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; Law; | |Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; Law; | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Publisher=Oxford University Press | |Publisher=Oxford University Press | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Address=Oxford | |Address=Oxford | ||
|Booktitle=Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods | |Booktitle=Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods | ||
|Pages=87–113 | |Pages=87–113 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210243.001.0001/acprof-9780190210243-chapter-5 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210243.003.0005 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Drawing on transcripts of public legal consultation conferences in Japan, this chapter explicates some methodic ways in which a member of the legal profession hears a citizen/client’s talk. It shows how (1) the conversational organization of the conference makes any individual piece of information displayed in the conversational turns observable as a feature of client’s telling and lawyer’s hearing; (2) lawyer’s ongoing and contingent judgments about the information told by the client are also displayed and made noticeable in the process; and (3) distinctively legal features of the story emerge through the differential but mutual attentiveness to the telling and hearing of a story of trouble. As a whole, the chapter presents and analyzes an instance of the social construction of legality as a uniquely situated methodic achievement in a lawyer’s hearing, fact-finding, and glossing of a story told in a legal setting. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:51, 15 December 2019
| Kashimura2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Kashimura2015 |
| Author(s) | Shiro Kashimura |
| Title | Hearing clients' talk as lawyers' work: the case of public legal consultation conference |
| Editor(s) | Baudouin Dupret, Michael Lynch, Tim Berard |
| Tag(s) | Ethnomethodology, Law |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | Oxford |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 87–113 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210243.003.0005 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Drawing on transcripts of public legal consultation conferences in Japan, this chapter explicates some methodic ways in which a member of the legal profession hears a citizen/client’s talk. It shows how (1) the conversational organization of the conference makes any individual piece of information displayed in the conversational turns observable as a feature of client’s telling and lawyer’s hearing; (2) lawyer’s ongoing and contingent judgments about the information told by the client are also displayed and made noticeable in the process; and (3) distinctively legal features of the story emerge through the differential but mutual attentiveness to the telling and hearing of a story of trouble. As a whole, the chapter presents and analyzes an instance of the social construction of legality as a uniquely situated methodic achievement in a lawyer’s hearing, fact-finding, and glossing of a story told in a legal setting.
Notes
