Difference between revisions of "Kaminskiy2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Emma Kaminskiy; Mick Finlay |Title=It Does Take Two to Tango: An Applied Conversation Analysis of Interactions between a Psychiatrist an...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Emma Kaminskiy; Mick Finlay | |Author(s)=Emma Kaminskiy; Mick Finlay | ||
| − | |Title=It | + | |Title=It does take two to tango: an applied conversation analysis of interactions between a psychiatrist and service-users discussing medication |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Applied CA; Psychiatry; Medication; Service | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Applied CA; Psychiatry; Medication; Service |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Kaminskiy2019 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2019 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Health Communication | |Journal=Health Communication | ||
| + | |Volume=34 | ||
| + | |Number=13 | ||
| + | |Pages=1628–1636 | ||
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2018.1517633 | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2018.1517633 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1080/10410236.2018.1517633 |
|Abstract=Decisions concerning psychiatric medication are complex and often involve a protracted process of trial and error. We examine three recorded meetings for power-sharing and power-taking discourse strategies employed by both the psychiatrist and mental health service-user, when discussing psychiatric medication. We identify examples of good practice, as well as missed opportunities to engage service-users in co-constructed dialogue, and highlight that participation and active involvement in decisions is not best seen as a fixed pattern, but is a complex interplay that changes both between and within interactions. | |Abstract=Decisions concerning psychiatric medication are complex and often involve a protracted process of trial and error. We examine three recorded meetings for power-sharing and power-taking discourse strategies employed by both the psychiatrist and mental health service-user, when discussing psychiatric medication. We identify examples of good practice, as well as missed opportunities to engage service-users in co-constructed dialogue, and highlight that participation and active involvement in decisions is not best seen as a fixed pattern, but is a complex interplay that changes both between and within interactions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:52, 29 November 2019
| Kaminskiy2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kaminskiy2019 |
| Author(s) | Emma Kaminskiy, Mick Finlay |
| Title | It does take two to tango: an applied conversation analysis of interactions between a psychiatrist and service-users discussing medication |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Applied CA, Psychiatry, Medication, Service |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Health Communication |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 13 |
| Pages | 1628–1636 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/10410236.2018.1517633 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Decisions concerning psychiatric medication are complex and often involve a protracted process of trial and error. We examine three recorded meetings for power-sharing and power-taking discourse strategies employed by both the psychiatrist and mental health service-user, when discussing psychiatric medication. We identify examples of good practice, as well as missed opportunities to engage service-users in co-constructed dialogue, and highlight that participation and active involvement in decisions is not best seen as a fixed pattern, but is a complex interplay that changes both between and within interactions.
Notes
