Difference between revisions of "Mazeland2010"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Harrie Mazeland; Leendert Plug; |Title=Doing confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential and prosodic characteristics of a Dutch dis...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Harrie Mazeland; Leendert Plug; | + | |Author(s)=Harrie Mazeland; Leendert Plug; |
|Title=Doing confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential and prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particle | |Title=Doing confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential and prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particle | ||
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Selting |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Dutch; Sequence organization; Prosody; Confirmations; Discourse Markers; Particle; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Dutch; Sequence organization; Prosody; Confirmations; Discourse Markers; Particle; |
|Key=Mazeland2010 | |Key=Mazeland2010 | ||
|Publisher=John Benjamins | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Address=Amsterdam | |Address=Amsterdam | ||
|Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | |Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=161–188 |
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/sidag.23.14maz | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.14maz | ||
| + | |Abstract=This paper offers sequential-interactional and prosodic observations on the confirmation forms ja hoor/nee hoor (‘yes’+ particle hoor/ ‘no’ + hoor) in Dutch talk-in-interaction, as part of a larger analysis of the form and function of the particle hoor. We show that ja/nee hoor is used as a marked confirmation in sequentially specifiable context-types. When used as a response to queries, the speaker marks doing confirmation as programmatically motivated. When used in environments that further sequence expansion, ja/nee hoor resists such expansion. Thus, the use of ja/nee hoor is motivated by an orientation to multiple levels of discourse organization. Ja/nee hoor is associated with recurrent pitch contours which are systematically distributed across environments of use. We discuss our findings in relation to previous findings on the use of hoor in Dutch. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:21, 25 November 2019
| Mazeland2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Mazeland2010 |
| Author(s) | Harrie Mazeland, Leendert Plug |
| Title | Doing confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential and prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particle |
| Editor(s) | Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Dutch, Sequence organization, Prosody, Confirmations, Discourse Markers, Particle |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 161–188 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/sidag.23.14maz |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Prosody in Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper offers sequential-interactional and prosodic observations on the confirmation forms ja hoor/nee hoor (‘yes’+ particle hoor/ ‘no’ + hoor) in Dutch talk-in-interaction, as part of a larger analysis of the form and function of the particle hoor. We show that ja/nee hoor is used as a marked confirmation in sequentially specifiable context-types. When used as a response to queries, the speaker marks doing confirmation as programmatically motivated. When used in environments that further sequence expansion, ja/nee hoor resists such expansion. Thus, the use of ja/nee hoor is motivated by an orientation to multiple levels of discourse organization. Ja/nee hoor is associated with recurrent pitch contours which are systematically distributed across environments of use. We discuss our findings in relation to previous findings on the use of hoor in Dutch.
Notes
