Difference between revisions of "Ogden2010"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; |Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Sel...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; | + | |Author(s)=Richard Ogden; |
|Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints | |Title=Prosodic constructions in making complaints | ||
|Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Selting; | |Editor(s)=Dagmar Barth-Weingarten; Elisabeth Reber; Margret Selting; | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; Complaints; Turn Construction; | + | |Tag(s)=IL; Prosody; Complaints; Turn Construction; |
|Key=Ogden2010 | |Key=Ogden2010 | ||
| − | |Publisher=John Benjamins | + | |Publisher=John Benjamins |
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
|Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | |Booktitle=Prosody in Interaction | ||
|Pages=81–104 | |Pages=81–104 | ||
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/sidag.23.10ogd | ||
|DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd | |DOI=10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd | ||
|Note=see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108 | |Note=see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108 | ||
|Abstract=What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management. | |Abstract=What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:24, 25 November 2019
| Ogden2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Ogden2010 |
| Author(s) | Richard Ogden |
| Title | Prosodic constructions in making complaints |
| Editor(s) | Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting |
| Tag(s) | IL, Prosody, Complaints, Turn Construction |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 81–104 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/sidag.23.10ogd |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Prosody in Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
What sorts of actions have phonetic exponents? Turn-taking and stance-marking can be handled phonetically: discontinuity (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2004a); prosodic stylisation (e.g. Ogden et al. 2004); and-uhm constructions (Local 2003); the use of ‘upgrading’ and ‘downgrading’ to mark types of agreement (Ogden 2006). Here I consider the linguistic construction of complaints based on a collection of complaints about third parties (Drew and Walker 2008). Two turn formats convey complaints. One format is designed to receive an affiliative response; the other is designed to close down a sequence. These turn types are phonetically distinct. Complaints are analysed as constructions: units of linguistic organisation that unite elements of linguistic form (including phonetics) with elements of meaning, including seeking affiliation and sequence management.
Notes
see: Hakulinen, Auli (2010) ‘The relevance of context to the performing of a complaint: Comments on Richard Ogden “Prosodic constructions in making complaints”’. In: Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting, eds. (2010) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 105–108
