Difference between revisions of "Coulter2009"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jeff Coulter; |Title=Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: Reflections on rules after Rawls |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sociology; Ethnome...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jeff Coulter; | + | |Author(s)=Jeff Coulter; |
|Title=Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: Reflections on rules after Rawls | |Title=Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: Reflections on rules after Rawls | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Sociology; Ethnomethodology; Wittgenstein; Language; Rules; Interpretation; Rawls | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sociology; Ethnomethodology; Wittgenstein; Language; Rules; Interpretation; Rawls | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=389–403 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468795x09344449 |
|DOI=10.1177/1468795X09344449 | |DOI=10.1177/1468795X09344449 | ||
|Abstract=In this discussion, I describe my introduction to Rawls’ famous paper on rules and situate this in a broader intellectual context. I then attempt to locate its significance within developments in linguistics (especially in speech-act analysis) and also in ethnomethodology. My main idea is that Rawls’ concept of a ‘constitutive rule’ is in deep harmony with many of Wittgenstein’s insights into the same thematic. | |Abstract=In this discussion, I describe my introduction to Rawls’ famous paper on rules and situate this in a broader intellectual context. I then attempt to locate its significance within developments in linguistics (especially in speech-act analysis) and also in ethnomethodology. My main idea is that Rawls’ concept of a ‘constitutive rule’ is in deep harmony with many of Wittgenstein’s insights into the same thematic. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:41, 23 November 2019
| Coulter2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Coulter2009 |
| Author(s) | Jeff Coulter |
| Title | Rule-following, rule-governance and rule-accord: Reflections on rules after Rawls |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sociology, Ethnomethodology, Wittgenstein, Language, Rules, Interpretation, Rawls |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Classical Sociology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 389–403 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468795X09344449 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this discussion, I describe my introduction to Rawls’ famous paper on rules and situate this in a broader intellectual context. I then attempt to locate its significance within developments in linguistics (especially in speech-act analysis) and also in ethnomethodology. My main idea is that Rawls’ concept of a ‘constitutive rule’ is in deep harmony with many of Wittgenstein’s insights into the same thematic.
Notes
