Difference between revisions of "Stax2004"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Hanne-Pernille Stax |Title=Paths to precision: probing turn format and turn-taking problems in standardized interviews |Tag(s)=EMCA; con...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=6 | |Volume=6 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=77–94 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445604039440 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445604039440 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445604039440 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Some scripted interview questions, built as multi-unit turns, generate a response before they reach their prescribed completion. Such ‘untimely’ interruption and premature production of responses may generate | + | |Abstract=Some scripted interview questions, built as multi-unit turns, generate a response before they reach their prescribed completion. Such ‘untimely’ interruption and premature production of responses may generate flawed data. In this article I will describe how untimely interruption also presents a problem with regard to non-scripted follow-up questions – or ‘probes’ – to closed survey items. I will try to show that some probing formats are more vulnerable than others to being interrupted before the listing of a second response option. I shall also consider the more general implications that probing format has for respondents’ understanding of ‘the ground rules’ for participating in a standardized interview. Current practices and recommendations for probing will be discussed in the light of the objective of collecting valid and reliable data. |
| − | second response option. I shall also consider the more general implications that | ||
| − | probing format has for respondents’ understanding of ‘the ground rules’ for participating in a standardized interview. Current practices and recommendations for probing will be discussed in the light of the objective of collecting valid and reliable data. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 31 October 2019
| Stax2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stax2004 |
| Author(s) | Hanne-Pernille Stax |
| Title | Paths to precision: probing turn format and turn-taking problems in standardized interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, probing, projection of turn completion, standardized interview |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 77–94 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445604039440 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Some scripted interview questions, built as multi-unit turns, generate a response before they reach their prescribed completion. Such ‘untimely’ interruption and premature production of responses may generate flawed data. In this article I will describe how untimely interruption also presents a problem with regard to non-scripted follow-up questions – or ‘probes’ – to closed survey items. I will try to show that some probing formats are more vulnerable than others to being interrupted before the listing of a second response option. I shall also consider the more general implications that probing format has for respondents’ understanding of ‘the ground rules’ for participating in a standardized interview. Current practices and recommendations for probing will be discussed in the light of the objective of collecting valid and reliable data.
Notes
