Difference between revisions of "Sanders1999"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Robert E. Sanders; |Title=The Impossibility of a Culturally Contexted Conversation Analysis: On Simultaneous, Distinct Types of Pragmat...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Robert E. Sanders;
 
|Author(s)=Robert E. Sanders;
−
|Title=The Impossibility of a Culturally Contexted
+
|Title=The impossibility of a culturally contexted conversation analysis: on simultaneous, distinct types of pragmatic meaning
−
Conversation Analysis: On Simultaneous, Distinct Types of Pragmatic Meaning
 
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Ethnography of communication
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Ethnography of communication
 
|Key=Sanders1999
 
|Key=Sanders1999
Line 11: Line 10:
 
|Volume=32
 
|Volume=32
 
|Number=1-2
 
|Number=1-2
−
|Pages=129-140
+
|Pages=129–140
−
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683616
+
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683616
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.1999.9683616
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.1999.9683616
−
|Abstract=There is a shared expectation that, ironically, seems to have created
 
−
some tension between ethnographers of communication and conversation
 
−
analysts.
 
−
1 The expectation is, as Moerman (1988, 1993) put it, that
 
−
“culture’s being exists in interaction’s time” and conversely that “culture
 
−
is the stuff, the substance, with which interaction is done” (1993, p. 94).
 
−
Hence, ethnographers of communication, expecting that communal
 
−
aspects of talk can be found and analytically foregrounded in the details
 
−
of routine, everyday interaction—not just in special ritualized or
 
−
ceremonial practices—tend to find work by conversation analysts sterile,
 
−
to have missed what it is in the talk and interaction that makes it grounded
 
−
and meaningful in the participants’ social world. This discontent often
 
−
applies even to the work of those occasional conversation analysts who
 
−
regard their work as having ethnographic import. Conversation analysts
 
−
for their part, expecting that ethnographers can and should attend first
 
−
and primarily to the particularities of interaction, fault ethnographers for
 
−
not doing so—for  relying too  much  instead  on informants and  other
 
−
sources of evidence external to the interactions of interest to tell them
 
−
what to focus on and what to make of it, and for aggregating details of
 
−
talk and interaction according to their alleged communal meanings, not
 
−
their recurrent, observable, form and sequential organization.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:59, 27 October 2019

Sanders1999
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sanders1999
Author(s) Robert E. Sanders
Title The impossibility of a culturally contexted conversation analysis: on simultaneous, distinct types of pragmatic meaning
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Ethnography of communication
Publisher
Year 1999
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research in Language and Social Interaction
Volume 32
Number 1-2
Pages 129–140
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.1999.9683616
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes


Retrieved from "https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Sanders1999&oldid=19303"