Difference between revisions of "TenHave1995c"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have; | |Author(s)=Paul ten Have; | ||
| − | |Title=Medical ethnomethodology: | + | |Title=Medical ethnomethodology: an overview |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; | ||
|Key=TenHave1995c | |Key=TenHave1995c | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Human Studies | |Journal=Human Studies | ||
|Volume=18 | |Volume=18 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2-3 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=245–261 |
| − | |Abstract=This paper gives a selective overview of studies in | + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01323212 |
| − | It | + | |DOI=10.1007/BF01323212 |
| + | |Abstract=This paper gives a selective overview of studies in ‘medical ethnomethodology’. It starts with the 1967 contributions by Garfinkel and Sudnow, which focus on medical action as accountable Then it discusses the many CA-inspired studies of doctor-patient interaction published during the 1980s. Finally, it points to scattered studies that suggest several ways in which this latter approach can be deepened and enlarged. In this way, it formulates the contours of a program for ethnomethodological studies in the medical field. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:14, 24 October 2019
| TenHave1995c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | TenHave1995c |
| Author(s) | Paul ten Have |
| Title | Medical ethnomethodology: an overview |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1995 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 2-3 |
| Pages | 245–261 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF01323212 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper gives a selective overview of studies in ‘medical ethnomethodology’. It starts with the 1967 contributions by Garfinkel and Sudnow, which focus on medical action as accountable Then it discusses the many CA-inspired studies of doctor-patient interaction published during the 1980s. Finally, it points to scattered studies that suggest several ways in which this latter approach can be deepened and enlarged. In this way, it formulates the contours of a program for ethnomethodological studies in the medical field.
Notes
