Difference between revisions of "Beach1993"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; | ||
| + | |Title=Transitional regularities for 'casual' “Okay” usages | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA | ||
|Key=Beach1993 | |Key=Beach1993 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=1993 | |Year=1993 | ||
|Month=apr | |Month=apr | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=325–352 | |Pages=325–352 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0378216693900924 |
|DOI=10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 | |DOI=10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 | ||
| + | |Abstract=An understanding of “Okay” usages in conversation requires analytic considerations extending beyond free-standing and non-continuative deployments. Relying on previous findings on how recipients and current speakers organize such activities as phone openings and closings, the present analysis addresses a wider variety of interactional environments in establishing certain predominant and thus fundamental features. Those addressed herein include how recipients and current speakers rely on “Okay” pivotally, at or near transition/opportunity spaces: Decidedly in response to prior talk, yet also in transitionally relevant (‘state of readiness’) ways via shifts/ movements to next-positioned matters. Though recipients or current speakers may (in next turn) treat prior “Okay” usages as non-continuative, and/or move to sequentially delete the actions “Okay” was taken to be projecting (i.e., ‘Okay + [fuller turn]’), just what participants appear to be prefacing or setting-up via “Okay” is recurrently (and eventually) apparent. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 23 October 2019
| Beach1993 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Beach1993 |
| Author(s) | Wayne A. Beach |
| Title | Transitional regularities for 'casual' “Okay” usages |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1993 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | apr |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 325–352 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
An understanding of “Okay” usages in conversation requires analytic considerations extending beyond free-standing and non-continuative deployments. Relying on previous findings on how recipients and current speakers organize such activities as phone openings and closings, the present analysis addresses a wider variety of interactional environments in establishing certain predominant and thus fundamental features. Those addressed herein include how recipients and current speakers rely on “Okay” pivotally, at or near transition/opportunity spaces: Decidedly in response to prior talk, yet also in transitionally relevant (‘state of readiness’) ways via shifts/ movements to next-positioned matters. Though recipients or current speakers may (in next turn) treat prior “Okay” usages as non-continuative, and/or move to sequentially delete the actions “Okay” was taken to be projecting (i.e., ‘Okay + [fuller turn]’), just what participants appear to be prefacing or setting-up via “Okay” is recurrently (and eventually) apparent.
Notes
