Difference between revisions of "Lynch1982b"

Latest revision as of 07:51, 20 October 2019

Lynch1982b
BibType	ARTICLE
Key	Lynch1982b
Author(s)	Michael Lynch
Title	Closure and disclosure in pre-trial argument
Editor(s)
Tag(s)	EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Justice
Publisher
Year	1982
Language
City
Month
Journal	Human Studies
Volume	5
Number	1
Pages	15–33
URL	Link
DOI	10.1007/BF02127682
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Abstract

Notes

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |Journal=Human Studies
 |Volume=5
-|Pages=15-33
+|Number=1
-|Abstract=This paper is a study of arguments between prosecutors and  defense  counsels during
+|Pages=15–33
-discussions  of  cases  scheduled  for  trial  in a particular criminal  court  district
+|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02127682
-of Ontario,  Canada. Audiotapes of pre-trial discussions  were  recorded  in Crown
+|DOI=10.1007/BF02127682
-prosecutors' offices shortly before  courtroom  sessions  were  scheduled  to begin,
-and  these materials  were analyzed for  this study.
-The  focus  of  this analysis concerns  the phenomenon of  disclosure  as  an  achieved-orderliness  to pre-trial  arguments  between prosecutor and  defense  counsel.
-The phenomena of "argument" and  "disclosure"  which  are  central  to  the treatment  of
-"plea  bargaining" in  this paper  require some preliminary discussion to distinguish
-them  from  the  formal procedures described  under  those  names  in criminological
-and legal studies.
-Following this discussion, a documented analysis  of  several practices of argument
-used  in pre-trial discussions  will  be presented.
 }}