Difference between revisions of "Wagner1998"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Johannes Wagner; |Title=On doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhouse |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Wagner1998 |Year=1998 |Language=English...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Johannes Wagner; | |Author(s)=Johannes Wagner; | ||
| − | |Title=On doing being a guinea pig | + | |Title=On doing being a guinea pig: a response to Seedhouse |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | ||
|Key=Wagner1998 | |Key=Wagner1998 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=30 | |Volume=30 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=1 |
| − | |Note= | + | |Pages=103–113 |
| − | |Abstract=This | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216698000216 |
| + | |DOI=10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00021-6 | ||
| + | |Note=See Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998) 85-102 for Seedhouse's critique. | ||
| + | |Abstract=This reply to Seedhouse's response intends to further substantiate my methodological critique of data used in second language acquisition research. In a specific response to Seedhouse, I maintain that data from foreign language interaction pose new challenges to the study of talk-in-interaction. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 20 October 2019
| Wagner1998 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wagner1998 |
| Author(s) | Johannes Wagner |
| Title | On doing being a guinea pig: a response to Seedhouse |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1998 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 103–113 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00021-6 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This reply to Seedhouse's response intends to further substantiate my methodological critique of data used in second language acquisition research. In a specific response to Seedhouse, I maintain that data from foreign language interaction pose new challenges to the study of talk-in-interaction.
Notes
See Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1998) 85-102 for Seedhouse's critique.
