Difference between revisions of "Pollner1991"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; |Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics;...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; | + | |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; |
|Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity | |Title=Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics; Reflexivity; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Politics; Reflexivity; |
|Key=Pollner1991 | |Key=Pollner1991 | ||
|Year=1991 | |Year=1991 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096110 | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096110 | ||
|DOI=10.2307/2096110 | |DOI=10.2307/2096110 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The growing recognition of ethnomethodology has come at the expense of one of its most | ||
| + | original and promising initiatives - radical reflexivity. Although prominent in early ethnomethodological work, the recognition that all renderings of reality - including those of the social scientist-are contingent accomplishments has diminished in contemporary studies. I describe the emergence and fall of radical reflexivity within ethnomethodology, the processes contributing to its diminishing role, and the implications of the decline. Because radical reflexivity breaches the taken-for-granted practices of disciplines purporting to describe reality, it is a vital resource for ethnomethodology and sociology generally. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 03:26, 22 July 2019
| Pollner1991 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pollner1991 |
| Author(s) | Melvin Pollner |
| Title | Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Politics, Reflexivity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1991 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Sociological Review |
| Volume | 56 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 370-380 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2307/2096110 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The growing recognition of ethnomethodology has come at the expense of one of its most original and promising initiatives - radical reflexivity. Although prominent in early ethnomethodological work, the recognition that all renderings of reality - including those of the social scientist-are contingent accomplishments has diminished in contemporary studies. I describe the emergence and fall of radical reflexivity within ethnomethodology, the processes contributing to its diminishing role, and the implications of the decline. Because radical reflexivity breaches the taken-for-granted practices of disciplines purporting to describe reality, it is a vital resource for ethnomethodology and sociology generally.
Notes
