Difference between revisions of "Keevallik2018c"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |Title=Making up one’s mind in second position: Estonian no-preface in action plans |Editor(s)=John Heritage; Marja-L...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; | |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; | ||
|Title=Making up one’s mind in second position: Estonian no-preface in action plans | |Title=Making up one’s mind in second position: Estonian no-preface in action plans | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 4 October 2018
| Keevallik2018c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Keevallik2018c |
| Author(s) | Leelo Keevallik |
| Title | Making up one’s mind in second position: Estonian no-preface in action plans |
| Editor(s) | John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, second pair part, particle no, preference, Estonian, emergent grammar, interactional linguistics, turn-prefacing, temporality, complying, agreeing |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 315–338 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.11kee |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages |
| Chapter | 11 |
Abstract
This chapter discusses preferred responses that are delayed in their turn by the initial particle no in Estonian. It demonstrates that the turn-initial time-space may be employed for a display of “making up one’s mind”, either weighing matters outside the conversation or something already discussed in the talk. The paper argues that besides the dichotomous choice between the preferred and the dispreferred answer format, there are individual contingencies to consider in committing to future actions as made relevant in requests, proposals and suggestions. By marking a transition from prior resistance to compliance with a no-preface, the speaker indexes that the emerging response is carefully considered and therefore socially cohesive.
Notes
