Difference between revisions of "Bilmes1993"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; | ||
|Title=Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics | |Title=Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Culture; Implicature; Pragmatics; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Culture; Implicature; Pragmatics; Grice; |
|Key=Bilmes1993 | |Key=Bilmes1993 | ||
|Year=1993 | |Year=1993 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Pragmatics | |Journal=Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=3 | |Volume=3 | ||
|Pages=387-409 | |Pages=387-409 | ||
|URL=http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/viewFile/181/118 | |URL=http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/viewFile/181/118 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This paper is, in part, an attempt to "respecify" the study of implicature as an | ||
| + | ethnomethodological and conversation analytic undertaking. To the linguistic | ||
| + | pragmzrtists, I am proposing a methodological reorientation. To the | ||
| + | ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts, I am proposing a broadening of | ||
| + | interests ancl an open-minded appreciation of what linguistic pragmatics has to offer. | ||
| + | To both, I am suggesting an increased sensitivity to the subtleties of cultural context.a | ||
| + | There remains, of course, the question of whether Grice's particular proposals are | ||
| + | useful or accurate. In what tollows, I will have occasion to offer some evaluation of the Gricean approach, but I will be primarily concerned with presenting a form of nonGricean implicature. The approach that I propose grounds implicature in specific conversational procedures and cultural understandings, and produces, I believe, clearer and more constrained outcomes than Gricean procedures. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 1 January 2018
| Bilmes1993 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bilmes1993 |
| Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
| Title | Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Culture, Implicature, Pragmatics, Grice |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1993 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 387-409 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper is, in part, an attempt to "respecify" the study of implicature as an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic undertaking. To the linguistic pragmzrtists, I am proposing a methodological reorientation. To the ethnomethodologists and conversation analysts, I am proposing a broadening of interests ancl an open-minded appreciation of what linguistic pragmatics has to offer. To both, I am suggesting an increased sensitivity to the subtleties of cultural context.a There remains, of course, the question of whether Grice's particular proposals are useful or accurate. In what tollows, I will have occasion to offer some evaluation of the Gricean approach, but I will be primarily concerned with presenting a form of nonGricean implicature. The approach that I propose grounds implicature in specific conversational procedures and cultural understandings, and produces, I believe, clearer and more constrained outcomes than Gricean procedures.
Notes
