Difference between revisions of "Robles2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jessica S. Robles; |Title=Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; discourse analysis; misunderstanding; repair; ref...") |
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jessica S. Robles; | + | |Author(s)=Jessica S. Robles; |
|Title=Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction | |Title=Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; discourse analysis; misunderstanding; repair; reference; inference; intersubjectivity; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; discourse analysis; misunderstanding; repair; reference; inference; intersubjectivity; | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Robles2017a |
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Pragmatics | |Journal=Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=27 | |Volume=27 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= 57–86 | + | |Pages=57–86 |
|DOI=10.1075/prag.27.1.03rob | |DOI=10.1075/prag.27.1.03rob | ||
|Abstract=Te phenomenon of misunderstanding is a recurrent feature of everyday | |Abstract=Te phenomenon of misunderstanding is a recurrent feature of everyday | ||
Revision as of 06:07, 14 November 2017
| Robles2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Robles2017a |
| Author(s) | Jessica S. Robles |
| Title | Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, discourse analysis, misunderstanding, repair, reference, inference, intersubjectivity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics |
| Volume | 27 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 57–86 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1075/prag.27.1.03rob |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Te phenomenon of misunderstanding is a recurrent feature of everyday life – sometimes a source of frustration, sometimes a site of blame. But mis- understandings can also be seen as getting interactants out of (as well as into) trouble. For example, misunderstandings may be produced to deal with dis- afliative implications of ‘not being on the same page,’ and as such they may be deployed as a resource for avoiding trouble. Tis paper examines misunder- standing as a pragmatic accomplishment, focusing on the uses to which it is put in interactions as a practice for dealing with threats to intersubjectivity: the extent to which persons are aligned in terms of a current referent, activity, as- sessment, etc. A multimodal discourse analysis of audio and video recordings of naturally-occurring talk inspects moments in which misunderstandings are purported or displayed (rather than overtly invoked) as well as how such misunderstandings are oriented to as simply-repairable references, versus in- ferential matters more misaligned and potentially fraught. Rather than being a straightforward refection of an experience of trouble with understanding, misunderstanding may also be collaboratively produced to manage practical challenges to intersubjectivity.
Notes
