Difference between revisions of "Lee2011"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; |Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; In...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; | + | |Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee; |
|Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service | |Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Institutional interaction; Preference; Progressivity; Responses; Type-conformity; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Institutional interaction; Preference; Progressivity; Responses; Type-conformity; | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 27 January 2017
| Lee2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lee2011 |
| Author(s) | Seung-Hee Lee |
| Title | Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Institutional interaction, Preference, Progressivity, Responses, Type-conformity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 904–917 |
| URL | |
| DOI | doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.028 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In a set of calls to an airline service in which agents ask for customers’ identifying information, some customers respond by providing different, unrequested information. This paper examines these non-direct, nonconforming responses and shows that those customers anticipate hierarchical institution-specific stages in the activity and respond to the higher-level purpose for which the question was produced. Customers thereby promote the progress of the larger activity in an institutionally relevantway. This suggests that participants can depart from type-conformity with an orientation to activity progressivity.
Notes
