Difference between revisions of "Response Cries"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{#widget:Iframe | {{#widget:Iframe | ||
| − | |url= | + | |url=https://emcawiki.net/bibtex/browser.php?keywords=Response+Cries&bib=emca.bib |
|border=0 | |border=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 January 2023
From Goffman1978: "Some roguish utterances that appear to violate [interactional] interdependence, entering the stream of behavior at peculiar and unnatural places, producing communicative effects but no dialog."
Response cries are not an inherently EM/CA device, and there is a wide literature that takes up Goffman's terms and develops it in related areas of interaction studies e.g.:
- http://ideophone.org/ideophones-are-not-response-cries/
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03782166/18/2
However, many EM/CA studies develop Goffman's concept in terms of sequential analysis. Here is a growing bibliography of the papers in the EMCA wiki tagged with the 'response cries' keyword:
