Difference between revisions of "Schenkein1972"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jim N. Schenkein | |Author(s)=Jim N. Schenkein | ||
|Title=Towards the analysis of natural conversation and the sense of “heheh” | |Title=Towards the analysis of natural conversation and the sense of “heheh” | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Meaning; Conversation Analysis |
|Key=Schenkein1972 | |Key=Schenkein1972 | ||
|Year=1972 | |Year=1972 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.1972.6.issue-4/semi.1972.6.4.344/semi.1972.6.4.344.xml | |URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.1972.6.issue-4/semi.1972.6.4.344/semi.1972.6.4.344.xml | ||
|DOI=10.1515/semi.1972.6.4.344 | |DOI=10.1515/semi.1972.6.4.344 | ||
| + | |Abstract=In the present paper I shall be investigating a natural conversation to | ||
| + | come to some understanding of a class of utterables that, in the general | ||
| + | sense of the term, has no referent. These utterables are what they do, | ||
| + | and as a consequence they come to mean something in terms of the | ||
| + | action they are seen to perform. They are neither descriptions of what | ||
| + | they do, nor reports, nor accounts, nor are they routinely available to | ||
| + | talk about the meanings which their actions consummate. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 24 September 2018
| Schenkein1972 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Schenkein1972 |
| Author(s) | Jim N. Schenkein |
| Title | Towards the analysis of natural conversation and the sense of “heheh” |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Meaning, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1972 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 344–377 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/semi.1972.6.4.344 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In the present paper I shall be investigating a natural conversation to come to some understanding of a class of utterables that, in the general sense of the term, has no referent. These utterables are what they do, and as a consequence they come to mean something in terms of the action they are seen to perform. They are neither descriptions of what they do, nor reports, nor accounts, nor are they routinely available to talk about the meanings which their actions consummate.
Notes
