Difference between revisions of "Bogen1996"

Latest revision as of 06:35, 13 February 2016

Bogen1996
BibType	ARTICLE
Key	Bogen1996
Author(s)	David Bogen
Title	The allure of a “truly general theory of knowledge and science”: A comment on Pels
Editor(s)
Tag(s)	EMCA, Sociology of knowledge, Knowledge
Publisher
Year	1996
Language
City
Month
Journal	Sociological Theory
Volume	14
Number	2
Pages	187–192
URL	Link
DOI	10.2307/201906
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Abstract

Notes

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |BibType=ARTICLE
 |Author(s)=David Bogen;
-|Title=The allure of a "truly general theory of knowledge and science": A comment on Pels'
+|Title=The allure of a “truly general theory of knowledge and science”: A comment on Pels
 |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sociology of knowledge; Knowledge;
 |Key=Bogen1996
 |Year=1996
 |Journal=Sociological Theory
 |Volume=14
-|Pages=187-192
+|Number=2
-|URL=http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=3276483
+|Pages=187–192
-|Abstract=THERE. critically examines an article by D. Pels entitled "Karl Mannheim and the sociology of scientific knowledge: Towards a new agenda". It shows that for the latter the sociology of knowledge is in a deadlock. He warns against the growing influence of Wittgenstein he describes relativistic. Pels believes that an approach inspired by that of Mannheim will provide a general theoretical framework to better understand the nature of knowledge. THERE. this understanding are the theory developed by Wittgenstein. It shows that Pels misinterpreted the thought of it
+|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/201906
+|DOI=10.2307/201906
 }}