Difference between revisions of "Lerner-etal2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Galina B. Bolden; Alexa Hepburn; Jenny Mandelbaum; |Title=Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of f...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Galina B. Bolden; Alexa Hepburn; Jenny Mandelbaum; | + | |Author(s)=Gene H. Lerner; Galina B. Bolden; Alexa Hepburn; Jenny Mandelbaum; |
|Title=Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand | |Title=Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Reference; Repair; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Reference; Repair; |
|Key=Lerner-etal2012 | |Key=Lerner-etal2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=45 | |Volume=45 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=191–212 |
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2012.674190 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2012.674190 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This report examines what is involved when a speaker overtly selects one formulation over another by employing a repair operation that reformulates a reference in a way that adjusts or recalibrates it, rather than abandons the original referent altogether. Focusing primarily on references to persons, we show that, beyond the narrowing of a reference—increasing its precision—that results in an improved fit between a person reference and other components of a turn at talk, these reference recalibration repairs can be used to do such things as meeting the requirements of a story's telling, upgrading the credibility of an information source, and justifying a rejection. This ties speakers' overt concern with calibrating a categorical reference to the formation of action in their turn at talk. By contrast, we then show how broadening a reference—decreasing its precision—can be used as a method for displaying uncertainty and, thereby, recalibrating a reference to fit the manifest knowledge state of the speaker (or a recipient). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:52, 25 February 2016
| Lerner-etal2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lerner-etal2012 |
| Author(s) | Gene H. Lerner, Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, Jenny Mandelbaum |
| Title | Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Reference, Repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 45 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 191–212 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2012.674190 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This report examines what is involved when a speaker overtly selects one formulation over another by employing a repair operation that reformulates a reference in a way that adjusts or recalibrates it, rather than abandons the original referent altogether. Focusing primarily on references to persons, we show that, beyond the narrowing of a reference—increasing its precision—that results in an improved fit between a person reference and other components of a turn at talk, these reference recalibration repairs can be used to do such things as meeting the requirements of a story's telling, upgrading the credibility of an information source, and justifying a rejection. This ties speakers' overt concern with calibrating a categorical reference to the formation of action in their turn at talk. By contrast, we then show how broadening a reference—decreasing its precision—can be used as a method for displaying uncertainty and, thereby, recalibrating a reference to fit the manifest knowledge state of the speaker (or a recipient).
Notes
