Difference between revisions of "Emborg2026"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christina Emborg; |Title=Neurodivergent recipient design and intersubjectivity – A re-examination of perspective-taking in autism |Tag...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Christina Emborg; | |Author(s)=Christina Emborg; | ||
|Title=Neurodivergent recipient design and intersubjectivity – A re-examination of perspective-taking in autism | |Title=Neurodivergent recipient design and intersubjectivity – A re-examination of perspective-taking in autism | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Intersubjectivity; Conversation analysis; Recipient design; Perspective-taking; Autism | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Intersubjectivity; Conversation analysis; Recipient design; Perspective-taking; Autism |
|Key=Emborg2026 | |Key=Emborg2026 | ||
|Year=2026 | |Year=2026 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
| + | |Volume=28 | ||
| + | |Number=5 | ||
| + | |Pages=824–858 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456261417492 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456261417492 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/14614456261417492 | |DOI=10.1177/14614456261417492 | ||
|Abstract=This article offers a re-examination of perspective-taking skills in autism, based on the conversation analytic notions of recipient design and intersubjectivity. Perspective-taking is here conceptualised as an interactional achievement; an interpersonal, social process that builds shared understandings through sequential tradjectories of talk. Micro-analyses of naturally occurring interactions between adults with autism and neurotypical carers demonstrate autistic turns that are not designed with a sensitivity to recipients’ displayed needs in interaction, leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity. Four types of so-called neurodivergent recipient design are presented: (1) references that do not facilitate recipient recognition; (2) stereotypical ‘nonsense’ talk that does not facilitate the recipient’s action ascription; (3) non-repaired misunderstandings; and (4) perseverative storytellings that are pursued despite the recipient’s display of disinterest. The perspective-taking can be said to be mutually challenged in these interactions, as shared understandings are not achieved. Such interactional approach to perspective-taking offers ecologically valid insights into the problems that are observable in natural interactions between autistic and neurotypical people, and future quantitative research in the autistic intersubjectivity is suggested. | |Abstract=This article offers a re-examination of perspective-taking skills in autism, based on the conversation analytic notions of recipient design and intersubjectivity. Perspective-taking is here conceptualised as an interactional achievement; an interpersonal, social process that builds shared understandings through sequential tradjectories of talk. Micro-analyses of naturally occurring interactions between adults with autism and neurotypical carers demonstrate autistic turns that are not designed with a sensitivity to recipients’ displayed needs in interaction, leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity. Four types of so-called neurodivergent recipient design are presented: (1) references that do not facilitate recipient recognition; (2) stereotypical ‘nonsense’ talk that does not facilitate the recipient’s action ascription; (3) non-repaired misunderstandings; and (4) perseverative storytellings that are pursued despite the recipient’s display of disinterest. The perspective-taking can be said to be mutually challenged in these interactions, as shared understandings are not achieved. Such interactional approach to perspective-taking offers ecologically valid insights into the problems that are observable in natural interactions between autistic and neurotypical people, and future quantitative research in the autistic intersubjectivity is suggested. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:39, 6 October 2026
| Emborg2026 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Emborg2026 |
| Author(s) | Christina Emborg |
| Title | Neurodivergent recipient design and intersubjectivity – A re-examination of perspective-taking in autism |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Intersubjectivity, Conversation analysis, Recipient design, Perspective-taking, Autism |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2026 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 824–858 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614456261417492 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article offers a re-examination of perspective-taking skills in autism, based on the conversation analytic notions of recipient design and intersubjectivity. Perspective-taking is here conceptualised as an interactional achievement; an interpersonal, social process that builds shared understandings through sequential tradjectories of talk. Micro-analyses of naturally occurring interactions between adults with autism and neurotypical carers demonstrate autistic turns that are not designed with a sensitivity to recipients’ displayed needs in interaction, leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity. Four types of so-called neurodivergent recipient design are presented: (1) references that do not facilitate recipient recognition; (2) stereotypical ‘nonsense’ talk that does not facilitate the recipient’s action ascription; (3) non-repaired misunderstandings; and (4) perseverative storytellings that are pursued despite the recipient’s display of disinterest. The perspective-taking can be said to be mutually challenged in these interactions, as shared understandings are not achieved. Such interactional approach to perspective-taking offers ecologically valid insights into the problems that are observable in natural interactions between autistic and neurotypical people, and future quantitative research in the autistic intersubjectivity is suggested.
Notes
