Difference between revisions of "Due2014"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Brian Due |Title=The development of an idea in a context of rejection |Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; Workplace |Key=Due2014 |Year=2014 |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Brian Due | |Author(s)=Brian Due | ||
|Title=The development of an idea in a context of rejection | |Title=The development of an idea in a context of rejection | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; Workplace | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; Workplace | ||
|Key=Due2014 | |Key=Due2014 | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Semiotica | |Journal=Semiotica | ||
| − | | | + | |Number=202 |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=207–240 |
|URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.2014.2014.issue-202/sem-2014-0036/sem-2014-0036.xml | |URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/semi.2014.2014.issue-202/sem-2014-0036/sem-2014-0036.xml | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1515/sem-2014-0036 |
|Abstract=On the basis of a single case analysis of a meeting in a Danish company, the article shows how participants cooperate and draw on different semiotic resources in their co-construction of a new idea. Thus, the article provides detailed descriptions of the first phase of an innovation process. The analysis is conducted on the basis of a video-ethnographic method and tools from multimodal studies and conversion analysis. The article shows how a new idea is constructed in a context of rejection by participants' affiliated response and distribution of cognition. | |Abstract=On the basis of a single case analysis of a meeting in a Danish company, the article shows how participants cooperate and draw on different semiotic resources in their co-construction of a new idea. Thus, the article provides detailed descriptions of the first phase of an innovation process. The analysis is conducted on the basis of a video-ethnographic method and tools from multimodal studies and conversion analysis. The article shows how a new idea is constructed in a context of rejection by participants' affiliated response and distribution of cognition. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:08, 6 December 2019
| Due2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Due2014 |
| Author(s) | Brian Due |
| Title | The development of an idea in a context of rejection |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Multimodality, Workplace |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | |
| Number | 202 |
| Pages | 207–240 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2014-0036 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
On the basis of a single case analysis of a meeting in a Danish company, the article shows how participants cooperate and draw on different semiotic resources in their co-construction of a new idea. Thus, the article provides detailed descriptions of the first phase of an innovation process. The analysis is conducted on the basis of a video-ethnographic method and tools from multimodal studies and conversion analysis. The article shows how a new idea is constructed in a context of rejection by participants' affiliated response and distribution of cognition.
Notes
