Difference between revisions of "Potter2011"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; |Title=Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: Transforming social psychology |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; | |Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; | ||
| − | |Title=Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: | + | |Title=Re-reading 'Discourse and Social Psychology': transforming social psychology |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology | ||
|Key=Potter2011 | |Key=Potter2011 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=436–455 |
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x | ||
| − | |Abstract=This paper considers one theme in the contemporary legacy of Potter and | + | |Abstract=This paper considers one theme in the contemporary legacy of Potter and Wetherell's (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. It overviews the context that led to that book and considers a series of critical responses from both experimental and critical/qualitative social psychologists. It refutes criticisms and corrects confusions. Focusing on contemporary discursive psychology, it highlights (a) its rigorous use of records of actual behaviour; (b) its systematic focus on normative practices. In methodological terms, it (a) highlights limitations in the use of open‐ended interviews; (b) considers the way naturalistic materials provide access to participants’ own orientations and displays; (c) builds a distinctive logic of sampling and generalization. In theoretical terms, it (a) highlights the way discourse work can identify foundational psychological matters; (b) offers a novel approach to emotion and embodiment; (c) starts to build a matrix of dimensions which are central to the constructing and recognizing of different kinds of social actions. It now offers a fully formed alternative social psychology which coordinates theory and method and a growing body of empirical work. |
| − | (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. It overviews the context that led to that book and | ||
| − | considers a series of critical responses from both experimental and critical/qualitative | ||
| − | social psychologists. It refutes criticisms and corrects confusions. Focusing on | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:24, 28 November 2019
| Potter2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Potter2011 |
| Author(s) | Jonathan Potter |
| Title | Re-reading 'Discourse and Social Psychology': transforming social psychology |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Discursive Psychology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 436–455 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper considers one theme in the contemporary legacy of Potter and Wetherell's (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. It overviews the context that led to that book and considers a series of critical responses from both experimental and critical/qualitative social psychologists. It refutes criticisms and corrects confusions. Focusing on contemporary discursive psychology, it highlights (a) its rigorous use of records of actual behaviour; (b) its systematic focus on normative practices. In methodological terms, it (a) highlights limitations in the use of open‐ended interviews; (b) considers the way naturalistic materials provide access to participants’ own orientations and displays; (c) builds a distinctive logic of sampling and generalization. In theoretical terms, it (a) highlights the way discourse work can identify foundational psychological matters; (b) offers a novel approach to emotion and embodiment; (c) starts to build a matrix of dimensions which are central to the constructing and recognizing of different kinds of social actions. It now offers a fully formed alternative social psychology which coordinates theory and method and a growing body of empirical work.
Notes
